NOW:53154:USA00949
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA00949
55°
H 64° L 44°
Partly Cloudy | 5MPH
  • Print

Franklin School Board candidates discuss age-old facility topic

Buildings and district funding are key issues

Jan. 31, 2012 | 38 comments

Franklin - For the first time in more than 20 years, Franklin Public Schools will have a primary election, with six candidates vying for two positions.

Those candidates are incumbents Judith Bialk and Janet Evans, who are both completing their first three-year term, and challengers Don Petre, Aimee Schlueter, John Thompson and David Works.

All six mentioned the aging district buildings as a major issue in the race, followed closely by the state budget and how its forcing school officials to rethink how they allocate resources.

The primary will be held Feb. 21, with the four contenders who garner the most votes advancing to the April 3 general election.

Room for growth?

The school district's enrollment is expected to grow from 4,296 students next year to 4,949 in the 2021-22 school year, according to the University of Wisconsin-Madison's Applied Population Laboratory.

The district's schools are already crowded, but a 2007 $77 million referendum to build a new high school and renovate and convert the existing one into a middle school was voted down.

And just last fall, 3,000 residents who responded to a district survey indicated they wanted renovation, not new construction, to ease crowding.

As the facilities planning process is just getting under way, candidates said they have little information to make an informed decision right now, but all acknowledged the issue will have to progress.

"My opinion is the schools need some improvement," said Evans, 57. "The buildings are sound. I am not in favor of anything that's a want."

Said Thompson, 64: "I haven't gotten all the information I need, but from what I've heard, the schools are growing. Packed classrooms don't help."

Work, 56, said he would recommend procuring land now for building in the future, if that's warranted. "I want to see what the community really wants," he said. "I want to see what the needs are."

Petre, 44, said there's not enough information out yet about how to proceed with the facilities plan, but that the districts buildings need to be improved.

"There are communities all around the state that have much better facilities than we do," he said, and that includes technology labs, athletic facilities and theatrical and arts areas.

At the same time, the state budget is forcing the district to find new ways to allocate resources.

Schlueter, 38, said it's a balancing act - finding ways to save money while not making cuts that would make "teachers' morale to drop."

"You have to balance the pros and cons," she said. "You have to decide what's best for everybody in the school, especially what's best for the students."

Bialk said that there may be some difficult decisions to be made to control spending.

"We will be looking at health insurance for teachers," said Bialk, 69. "That is something that will come up that's important this year."

A school of candidates

The incumbents said after three years on the board, they are just getting familiarized with issues and should be re-elected.

Bialk, a retired teacher, said she's a volunteer reading specialist in the district and that she should be re-elected because of her experience as an educator.

Evans, meanwhile, said she's helped keep spending in line. "I've been very fiscally responsible," she said. "I work for the taxpayer."

Petre, a teacher in Oak Creek, said his experience, and his ability to form school and business partnerships, makes his qualified to serve.

"I've been in the field of education for 23 years," he said. "I've worked with different school budgets, curriculum issues. I think I can bring that whole package that other candidates can't bring."

Schlueter, a 911 dispatcher for the Franklin Police Department and mother of two school-aged children, said the current board needs fresh ideas and does not communicate as well as it could.

"I feel there's a need for parents of school-age children to be heard," she said.

Thompson, as a retired deputy sheriff, has been in the classroom as a DARE instructor and as a former high school teacher.

"I've a wide range of experience working with kids," he said. "I've been in the classroom many a time as a DARE instructor. I also know what the public wants."

Works, a metallurgist for Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Division, said he would bring a unique manufacturing perspective to the board. He said he has also been a champion of advance placement classes and has partnered with businesses to bring in donated supplies for classes.

"We will need to look at ways to save, just like private industry," he said.

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can register through your Facebook account, sign on with your Facebook password and use the same photo and screen name. If you don’t want your account tied to Facebook, you can keep your registration through our site.
  • You can now personalize your Journal Sentinel account with a photo even if the account is not tied to Facebook.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
Comment threads per page: 10 | 20 | 50 | 100
  1. Nice, there are so many things you don't mention:
    1. The voters ousted David Works last election.
    2. Petre is not just a teacher but also Union Officer as Treasurer of the Oak Creek Teachers association which is a WEAC organization.
    3. Bialk is a retired teacher.

    Let's hear more about what these candidates have in their background. I want to know how they can help make Franklin schools greater and not just a great place to work.
    Hide replies
    • @mierkatze
      In addition she fails to mention:
      1) The voters ousted David Works because he was part of the Finance Committee which went by the premise " if we don't keep spending more, the taxpayers will continue to expect cuts every year". Works says the board should work for cost savings just like private industry does, but he did not show that philosophy during his 3 years on the board where he spent, and spent and spent. Read what he said in the interview above " he would recommend procuring land now for building in the future, if that's warranted. "I want to see what the community really wants," he said. "I want to see what the needs are." So why didn't you read what the community wants when the district spent the money on the survey last year Dave? It is available to a non-board member like yourself if you were really so dedicated to becoming a member again.
    • 2) Petre is part of the WEAC Union plan to get their members on every board to prevent changes to benefits. In other words, We have the tools to reign in spending, but we don't need to use them. Petre is on the Oak Creek board and is a supporter of the "Recall Scott Walker" crowd. He says in his statement above: "There are communities all around the state that have much better facilities than we do," he said, and that includes technology labs, athletic facilities and theatrical and arts areas." Sure and there are communities that have more higher end homes or facilities that were built by private donations. There are also communities that pay their teachers and staff less than we do. Would he be willing to cut staff, wages and programs to finance facility building?

      3) Bialk has always been and continues to be, a pawn of Dr. Patz and has a history of going along with EVERY spending vote while she has been a Board member.
    • Last but not least.... This article states:"just last fall, 3,000 residents who responded to a district survey indicated they wanted renovation, not new construction, to ease crowding." The comment section, which was not published by the Franklin Public School District but I requested a copy from the School System. Comments indicated that, yes the responders wanted renovation, as long is IT DID NOT RAISE THEIR TAXES, which is what a spending referendum would do.

      The last thing this district needs is another "educator" or former educator who will never question the pro spending school administration bias in the Franklin Public school system, that predominates the current Board of Education . We need more people like Janet Evans who will question the difference between the wants and the needs of the FPS and works toward giving our children the best education for a price that we can afford.

      I look forward to hearing these candidates when they answer community questions at the Candidate Forum on Monday February 13th at 7pm at the Root River Center on Rawson avenue. I hope these people have more answers for us than "we will have to see!" because then it is too late for three years of them in office.
  2. Each of the candidates mentions an admirable qualification that they could bring to the Franklin School Board. I feel that I am an excellent candidate because I bring a combination of these best traits.

    I also am the parent of school-age children. I have two daughters that will be in our Franklin Public Schools for many more years. As a parent, I have a vested interest in maintaining and improving their educational experience.

    Two candidates mention their former experiences in the classroom. However, I bring that experience currently. Education has changed over the years and I will bring up-to-date knowledge and insight to the table.

    Another candidate mentions being fiscally responsible. All of us will need to do this over the next several years because of the massive cuts to the education budget that are being handed down from the state level. As School Board members, we cannot influence these changes being handed down from the state level, but we will all need to be fiscally responsible as we implement these budget challenges at the local level.

    I also bring a unique perspective with a connection between schools and private industry. Last semester, I was a teacher at the Caterpillar STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) Academy. We taught high school students on-site at the Caterpillar facility. Students were given hands-on experiences and daily interaction with Caterpillar employees to use their classroom knowledge directly with real-life applications. I have experienced the excellent relationship between business and schools. On the School Board, I will work to enhance the connections between business and schools so that our entire community will benefit.

    Thank you.

    Don Petre
    Franklin School Board Candidate
    Hide replies
    • Are you going to resign from the Oak Creek Educators Association where the WEAC website currently shows you are their Treasurer?

      If not, that shows your loyalty will not lie with the taxpayers or students.
    • The budget cuts started well before Walker. Under the Doyle Admin, he cut state support to the local schools by at least 1.6 Billion during his 8 years.

      It is incumbent on all board members to put the taxpayers first while striving for a 1st Class education in our schools. There was huge backlash against the school board for their outlandish building plan that completely ignored the citizen inputs they solicited.

      Will you listen to the taxpayers and follow their inputs when it comes to maintaining fiscal responsibility?
    • Are you attending the School Board Candidate forum at the Root River Center on Feb 13th? It sounds like it's going to be the only time the voters get to meet the candidates before the Primary on Feb 21st.
    • This “interview” isn’t what the candidates necessarily mention as their best qualification, it’s what the writer decided to print regarding the candidates (which is why you obviously felt a need to elaborate on the points about you). What you convey as making you an “excellent” candidate seems to disregard a large portion of the Franklin School District citizenry. When you elaborate upon the fact that you are a parent of school age children, thereby giving you a vested interest – what makes you think households without children and senior citizens don’t have a vested interest in improving education in our community? My children were very successful students in FPS and college and have wonderful careers. I want to see the same for all FPS students. And experience in the classroom? Not every citizen is a current or retired educator. A School Board should encompass an array of backgrounds. We have an Administration employed by the District to present the Board with “up-to-date knowledge and insight” regarding our School District. Are you running for Board member or do you want a position as an Administrator in the District? As a School Board member (and citizen) you are able to influence changes at the state level – that would be by legislative advocacy. Board members all over the nation are involved in this process. As far as fiscal responsibility, the voting record of Board members can prove who only talks the talk. Lastly, you are not the only candidate who has been fortunate to have employment allowing you to rub elbows with businesses. This is a perk and every District benefits from partnerships. You don’t have to be a Board member to send those connections over, especially since you have a “vested interest in maintaining and improving [the] educational experience” of your children. I also cast a vote on election day and am curious why you are seeking this office? I always find it interesting when candidates wait until the final day to turn in election papers.
    • Petre, Why did you take down the "recall walker" sign that you had in your yard? oh yeah.... probably would be held against you in the election. Why are you afraid to stand up for what you believe and let others see that? I'm sure the fact that you are a weac treasurer means you certainly will be unbiased in any of your decisions...lol. your campaign signs are illegal, or is that just another "minor detail" that you are choosing to overlook? What other things are you willing to overlook? it's fairly obvious the unions are trying to stock school board races with bias members to get favorable results. go away union pig!!
  3. My goodness....a Teacher on the school board......next thing they'll want is a Doctor on the Medical Board. I moved to Franklin because I wanted a school system that would give my children the ability to compete in an increasingly educated society. I also payed a premium for my home, due to being in Franklin, and continue to pay high taxes that are lower in all of the surrounding areas. If we should allow our Franklin Education system to diminish, we should expect our home values as well as demand for our property to also diminish. At a time when many school districts are gutting their education systems we might want to invest in ours, then tout it....and perhaps there would be less homes on the market here in Franklin.
  4. I am tired of FranklinNOW reporters’ bias toward Franklin government and their willingness to shield the school board and city government by all too often failing to do background on the stories they publish and reporters’ unwillingness to challenge the answers of these candidates and government officials.

    The readers know more about the candidates than the reporter.
    Hide replies
  5. SCHLUETER is worried about teachers morale dropping. hmmm. paying a smaller percentage towards health care and retirement benefits than the taxpayers that pay their salaries, still being able to retire in their mid-50's and having the Summers and major holidays off with no weekend work.... still seems like a good gig to me.
  6. BIALK- mentions looking at health care for teachers. hmmm as a former teacher, I wonder who's side she is on? No wonder there is such an influx of lefties running for a school board position this year. Why does Dr. Patz make so much? Can't his salary be lowered during his next contract negotiation?
  7. Why do people think being "in the classroom" is a great qualification for being a shcool board member? Being on the school board means you are more on the business end of decision making. I would think if you were in the classroom, your decision making ability would be clouded or biased against the taxpayer. We should pay good teachers more and bad ones less. We should also have them work later in life so we get more "bang for our taxpaying buck". If a good teacher teaches 5-10 years longer our children and community will be better off. Giving the teachers the ability/means to retire at 55 shortchanges the children and community as a whole.
    Hide replies
    • @ Jebidiah, you state " pay good teachers more and the bad ones less", But you just posted your thoughts about how BIALK and SCHLUETER sounded to worried about the teachers and their benefits. Sorry dude can't have both. Teachers make enough now and have benefits that need to reformatted period.
    • that's correct, i am concerned about how they sounded to be worried about their BENEFITS. I have a friend who is a teacher, a good teacher. goes way above and beyond the call of duty. i know what he makes, he should make more. BUT he should also have to pay for his benefits and retirement. There are also teachers who don't work nearly as hard as he does and make the same or more. That is wrong. So yes, you can have it both ways. I want the good teachers to be fairly compensated and to stick around a long time while the weak unproductive ones should be held accountable and not protected by tenure. Our schools will improve. "Teachers make enough now" is too much of a blanket statement..
  8. I believe the only 2 candidates that sound remotely concerned for the taxpayers are EVANS and SCHLUETER. Evans has shown her taxpayer watch dog tactics through her track record. Schlueter sounds like taxes area a concern to her and is not somehow connected in one way or another to being a teacher / retired teacher or connected to a teacher's association. Also everybody else gave hints or statements of wanting to move forward with the referendum, And well WORKS, WORKS was voted off the board for a reason don't forget that.
  9. To bad they were working behind party lines and didn't go after stimulus money. We could have put people to work on the fedral tax dollar, now they are going to want the city tax payer to come up with the millions to build new schools!
  10. howaboutit may have it right. But the bottom line is that without a mass turnover on the Franklin School Board we're going to get taxed out of our minds.

    When a board member says "it's for the kids" hold on to your wallet.

    When a board member says they have kids in the schools, bet on a building referendum.

    Where's the board member candidate (Evans excluded) who's watching out for the taxpayers?

    I suspect that Mr. Petre is a union plant. Works and Bialk have shown their colors...

    What's left?
Suburban News Roundup

E-mail Newsletter

Your link to the biggest stories in the suburbs delivered Thursday mornings.


Enter your e-mail address above and click "Sign Up Now!" to begin receiving your e-mail newsletter
Get the Newsletter!

Login or Register to manage all your newsletter preferences.

advertisement

Local Crime Map

CONNECT    

advertisement

Latest Photo Galleries